• will write for food

    And also cash. In addition, I'll gladly edit essays, articles, books—anything with sentences, really—that you have written. Email alymhawkins [at] gmail [dot] com.
  • he said, she said

    Amanda Workman on a true myth, postscript
    Bud Oliver on the “where I am with lif…
    Aly Hawkins on a true myth, postscript
  • off the shelf

    Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson
  • what you missed

  • topics of interest

  • under the hood

stories I don’t like to tell: healthcare edition

[Previous "Stories I Like to Tell" posts here.]

There are stories I like to tell, and there are stories I don’t like to tell but that need telling. This is one of the latter. I’ll try to make it interesting.

I got laid off last October, by a publishing company for which I worked for almost five years. The industry as a whole has been hard-hit by the economic downturn, and nearly every publisher has had to make drastic cuts. Of course, getting laid off was a shock, and I was sad and disoriented for awhile. But I had been thinking about striking out on my own as a freelancer for more than a year, and it turned out that losing my job was exactly the kick in the pants I needed. I’m happy to report that I’ve been working steadily and bringing in a livable income for about eight months. (More work is always welcome, nudge-nudge!)

There was (and is) a problem, however. We had terrific health insurance through my employer, and continuing that coverage through COBRA would have cost nearly $800 a month (for two people!). This we could not afford—it was more than our rent! “Not to worry,” we said to each other. “We’ll apply for an individual policy—a bare-bones, catastrophic-care, astronomically high-deductible policy that will be a stop-gap for emergencies until such a time as we can afford more comprehensive coverage.” Paying for health insurance—just like paying for car or renter’s insurance—is part of being responsible adults, and going without on faith that we’d never need to see the doctor was not an option.

Health Insurance

We got turned down flat by every private insurer to which we applied—and we applied to a great many. I have Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (whew!), a genetic disorder that, in my family, results in occasional gastro-intestinal bleeding. (I tell my mom, “At least I got your brains and good looks, too.”) As you might imagine, HHT is considered a pre-existing condition—it being all genetic and whatnot—and we found out right swiftly that no insurance company would touch me.

In the middle of all that drama, my kidneys went all wonky (because random G.I. bleeding and starting a new business and trying to find health insurance were not enough to keep me occupied). When the problem could no longer be ignored, we discovered that our county has a healthcare program for low-income families—which, at that time, we were. I have received outstanding, affordable care since we were accepted into the program, and am incredibly thankful for the last resort offered by our local government.

But . . . the program is offered for 12 months at a time, and at the end of December we will lose our last resort. We’ve worked our way out of low-income-ness and will no longer qualify by the end of the year. We will renew our quest for healthcare coverage at square one.

I know there are people who are worried at the prospect of a public health plan. They’re worried that a “public option” will hurt private industry or that healthcare will be “rationed” (take it from me—it already is!) or that the costs will far outstrip the benefits. These seem like legitimate concerns, and honestly, I’m not far enough down in the healthcare policy weeds to give an adequate answer to them.

But outside a public plan, I come up with only one option: Get a job with health benefits. I am open to this option—not thrilled with; open to—but am almost certain it would mean a complete career change, given the current condition of the publishing industry. (It occurs to me that I must write a post about the state and future of publishing. Stay tuned.)

I love what I do. I want to keep doing it. If possible, I’d like to keep doing it without a boss. I have time to go to my many doctors’ appointments, to garden, to cook, to hang out with my husband and other resident mammals, and to (occasionally) tinker with my own writing projects—and still get my clients’ work done. I don’t savor the idea of trading all that work-life balance away to punch the clock at a job that’s likely outside my training, expertise and satisfaction.

Bring on the government-funded healthcare, I say. But maybe you have other ideas . . . ?

words I like: deadline

The great Douglas Adams once said, “I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.” I do not like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by, but I do love deadlines—I work best under the gun. If there’s no end in sight, I can find an infinite number of pointless activities to fill my time, all of them unrelated to whatever project is crying out for closure. Deadlines are my friend, the kind of friend who won’t let you off the hook because she knows you can do better.

But I also like the word “deadline.” It’s so dramatic! It’s the line behind which death resides, which is way more visceral a word picture than “due date” or “time limit.”

“Cross this line,” Deadline says, “and die.”

Deadline

Deadline

sweet communion

Eucharist

I’m part of a church community that takes communion (that’s the Eucharist for all you Anglo-Catholics) on the first Sunday of every month. As I understand it, this is pretty common practice in American evangelical churches. Even though I love many other things about my church, most of them being the people, I wish it were different.

I think I understand, from a historical perspective, why the focus of “low-church” services shifted (starting about the time of the Second Great Awakening) from the Eucharist to preaching the Word: Saving souls was the goal, and everyone agreed that couldn’t happen through a sip of wine and a nibble of bread.

At the same time, there was a growing emphasis on individual, rather than communal, discipleship; every person was recognized to be individually accountable before God—you couldn’t be grandfathered in, so to speak. The practice of communion began to reflect this new understanding. Rather than sharing a common cup and loaf (as in intinction), some churches began to parcel out the communion elements into individual servings. Communion meditations and homilies also changed. Instead of emphasizing the shared Life of Christ present in or symbolized by the bread and wine, pastors challenged their parishioners to personal spiritual reflection—each person needed to “get right with God” before taking communion.

[This short lesson in history brought to you by Charles Finney: New Divinity at Its Finney-ist.]

I get why these shifts took place—in large measure, they were a needed corrective to a lifeless, cultural Christianity that was more about paying social dues than about spiritual renewal—but I think that something vital to the life of the Church got lost in the process. Whether or not one believes that the body and blood of Christ is, in some essential way, present in the Eucharist, I think believers can all agree that he is present in the collective Body of Christ, the Church. Taking the bread and wine—together—should be a celebration of that Presence.

And we should celebrate more often! I’d like to suggest that the guys (they were almost all guys) who thought that saving souls couldn’t happen through a sip of wine and a nibble of bread got it wrong. Any time we recognize and celebrate the Presence of God among us, salvation leaks out all over—it’s one thing to hear a preacher talk about the Life of Christ, and quite another to experience that Life lighting up the whole place.

up with little people

Bryan and I finally went to see Up yesterday. Holy smokes, what a film: moving, hilarious, nuanced, gorgeous to look at (my only regret is not seeing it in 3-D).

We saw it with a friend and her two kids, who are three and nine. (I highly recommend seeing “kids’ movies” with kids.) I sat between Bryan and Zion, the nine-year-old. Zion did totally ordinary nine-year-old-boy things, such as burp after every slurp of Cherry Coke and “whisper” commentary to his mom. Yet I overheard some of his commentary, and it struck me as rather extra-ordinary for a nine-year-old.

Around the 15-minute mark, the main character, Carl, goes through a rough patch (this is a gross understatement, but I don’t want to spoil). Grief and regret lead Carl to become a crotchety old man, which we (the audience) already know is out of character. There’s not a lot of dialog to tell us that Carl has changed, but there are a ton of visual cues—and Zion was totally tuned in to these nuances. “Mom!” he hissed, in his not-so-subtle whisper. “Look how he’s so square and is always in the shadows! He’s boxed up and in the dark!”

Color me deeply impressed. I haven’t hung out with many nine-year-olds, so maybe someone can answer me this: Are powers of observation that acute common to kids of that age?

words I like: lexicographical

[Previous posts in the Words I Like series here.]

All hail the double dactyl!

More from Eric McKean at her blog, which is deeply entertaining.

re-reading for the craft

When we moved, lo these two months ago, we unboxed about half our library, the entirety of which had been in storage for several years. When we packed them up, we hadn’t the room and yet couldn’t bear to be parted from them, so into the dark they’d gone until such a time as we again had space. They seemed mighty happy to see us, the 250 or so we unboxed and lined up on shelves, and the feeling was mutual.

Plucking a few of these neglected friends from their perch during the last few weeks and putting them to the use for which God intended, I discovered something interesting: I missed a lot of the writing the first time. I don’t mean that I forgot the stories or the characters (I’ve mainly been re-reading novels)—I’ve always had rather a good head for remembering plots and the people who people them. What I mean is that, the first time I read these stories, the craft with which the authors told them got right by me.

So far as I can determine, this is for one or both of these reasons: 1) I read scary-fast, and once I’m caught in the current of a swiftly moving tale, I can’t steer my attention toward anything but What Happens Next, and/or 2) I read these books before I got into the word business and couldn’t be bothered to notice something that clearly didn’t concern me.

Either way, I sure as heck am enjoying the return trip. Who knew all the tricky shenanigans writers can conjure in service of a good story?

I’m re-reading Salman Rushdie’s The Ground Beneath Her Feet at the moment, which I think I must have read (the first time) not too long after it came out in 1999. Ten or so years on, I remembered that it’s a rock n’ roll re-imagining of Orpheus and Eurydice, and that it takes place in a parallel universe not so very different from our own, except that Elvis’s name is Jesse Garon and Kennedy serves out two terms before being killed in L.A. by the same bullet that offs his brother Robert. What I didn’t catch, ten years ago, is the craftiness with which Rushdie made these and similar “adjustments.” Twinship and brotherhood, and the competitive and creative intimacy inherent to these relationships, are thematic threads woven in and around the broader myth. In Rushdie’s crafty hands, Jesse Garon is the twin who grows up to light the world on fire with “Blue Suede Shoes,” long after his younger brother, Elvis Aron, is stillborn. Jack Kennedy gets his chance to shine for eight years, but then his life and Robert’s are cut short—by the same bullet, because he’s standing behind Robert!—just when he’s ready to help his brother move out from behind his shadow.

Crafty craftiness.

I could go on and on about minor characters who are hanged portending momentous change in major characters’ arcs, about fathers’ and mothers’ choices foreshadowing their children’s destinies, about characters’ names shedding indirect light on their roles in the narrative. But you probably noticed it all without my help.

How on earth could I have missed all that craft? And, more importantly, how do I get some craft to call my own?

back in the saddle

I guess it’s pretty obvious that I’ve found balancing life, work and blogging to be a bit of a stinker. Blogging, also obviously, has taken a back seat of late. This is, I hope, the first post in a new era of semi-consistent writing. We’re moved in. I’m working steadily but not frantically. The tempo of life is thumping along to a good groove, rather than racing to the next movement before I can get a handle on the motif.

What’s been goin’ on? Not really anything glamorous or front-page-worthy, but that’s kind of an okay thing. Bryan started leading worship at a church in Goleta, CA, a few months ago, and it’s going really well so far. I think that he’s not fully alive unless he’s doing what he does best—and it’s been wonderful to see him “waking up” those parts of himself that had been taking a much-needed rest for awhile. I wrote a few months back that, over the last year or so, I’d begun to miss being part of a church. While I still feel a little skittish when I contemplate the potential slings and arrows that are part and parcel of a life in vocational ministry, I feel cautiously optimistic that our new faith community is a place where we can love and be loved, with everybody in agreement that sometimes either or both are difficult. These are good people. And boy, are they ready to worship.

I’ve got some tomatoes coming on. It’s embarrassing how proud this makes me, as if I have single-handedly called forth fruit from the earth. Now if I can just get the cats to stop raiding the basil, bruschetta will be on the menu later this month. Maybe with a well-chilled pinot grigio; it’s hot in Ojai.

A month after moving into our new place, Bryan and I were united in our hatred of our living room, so we did a flashback to college and descended upon the local thrift stores. We picked up a couple super-bitchin’ couches (which need badly to be steam-cleaned, but that will have to wait) and an unmatched pair of end tables. I’ve spent the last week stripping and refinishing the tables (Bryan: “I feel funny when you talk to the Lowe’s painting professional about cheap strippers”), which project was ever-so-much more involved and time-consuming than I expected. Here are the pleasing results of my labors:

Small Table BEFORE

Small Table BEFORE

Small Table AFTER

Small Table AFTER

Large Table BEFORE

Large Table BEFORE

Large Table AFTER

Large Table AFTER

I think you’ll agree that I rock.

And, by the way, the incredible painting hanging above “Small Table AFTER” is by my friend June Steckler. You should buy a painting from her, too, because 1) it will make your thrift-store couches look on purpose and 2) supporting good artists who will someday be great is important.

Last bit of house-keeping: Still waiting for a diagnosis on the kidney front (I know, still?). In the meantime, I’ll be getting my first iron infusion on Tuesday, to help my red-blood-cell production get into the black. I’ve taken iron supplements for years, but the ol’ blood factory just ain’t keeping up. Anyway, prayers are appreciated. And also tips.

More soon, loves . . .